Better Testing MethodsFor years the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) provided a test standard/procedure for determining the performance of an air filter. Adopted in 1968 as Standard 52-68 it went through revisions in 1976 and again in 1992. Its current title is ASHRAE Standard 52.1-1992. This test, while valuable, was difficult to explain and, as a result, could be somewhat confusing. In an attempt to provide more specific information that was easier to understand, ASHRAE created a new document titled ASHRAE Standard 52.2 which identifies a filter’s performance on specific particle size ranges. The results are reported as Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) levels.
The MERV levels provide a clear understanding of what removal percentage can be expected for specific particle size ranges. Range E1 is for particles in the 0.3 – 1.0 micron* range. E2 is for particles 1.0 – 3.0 microns in size and E3 is for particles 3.0 – 10.0 microns. The filter is tested on all three ranges and based on its performance is rated numerically from 1 – 16. Becoming familiar with the MERV level of a filter being considered for use will ensure that a minimum performance standard can be planned for and counted on. It is a good idea to consult with a local filter expert to review and explain the various MERV levels as they relate to the filters being considered.
Better FiltersThe filter industry has come a long way in developing a wide array of user friendly products. Low efficiency panel filters (both pleated and non-pleated with MERV levels generally below 12) have been around a long time and are generally low in cost and low in resistance to airflow. Of course, they are lower in performance and dust removal capabilities as well. High efficiency filters (generally above MERV 12) have also been around for a long time but have historically been so much more restrictive to airflow that upgrading from a panel to a more efficient filter was often not feasible without major equipment modifications. Fortunately, with improvements in media and filter design that is no longer true.
A new generation of high efficiency products provides much higher performance while operating at resistance levels closer to those of panel filters. Some of these new products offer unique media pack designs which reduce configuration losses through the filter. Others offer thinner media packs which also enable the air to pass through with lower resistance.
The filter industry is also stepping up with many user friendly sizes to enable most systems to be improved quickly and easily. Previously, if a system was designed for panel filters, it was very difficult to upgrade to something better without removing the existing framing system and replacing it with something more universal. The focus is now to provide products that will fit exiting equipment without modifications.
Better Filtration SystemsGiven all this new information, how do you choose which air filter is best for you? There are some key questions that need to be asked and answered before making a choice.
• Is the current filter system performing in an acceptable manner?
• Is there an interest in keeping the air handling equipment cleaner?
• Is there an interest in making the air safer and healthier for building occupants?
Let’s take them one at a time. If the current filter system is performing well, then changing the MERV level may not be desired. However, there are good options available that will lower energy costs resulting in lower annual operating costs. Choosing a filter that operates at a lower pressure drop will normally lead to reduced energy consumption. It’s important that the maintenance department communicates with building management to identify and quantify the amount of energy dollars saved. In addition, the use of longer lasting filters can and will reduce maintenance costs through a reduction of annual filter changeouts. Eliminating even one periodic filter change saves man-hours which saves money while maintaining or improving existing performance levels.
If the goal is to keep the air handling equipment cleaner, there are many options. Once the MERV level of existing filters is identified, it is easy to consider upgrades. Taking the example of an owner using a MERV 6 product - it makes sense to consider at least a MERV 7 or even a MERV 8. The highest performance that can be expected from a MERV 6 is 49.9 percent removal of 3.0 – 10.0 micron size particles. Upgrading to a MERV 8 increases this upper end efficiency to 84.9 percent for the same particle size range. That is a 70 percent improvement in efficiency and the difference in product cost between a MERV 6 and a MERV 8 is relatively small. Keeping the equipment cleaner offers many benefits; one of the most important is operating with cleaner coils. Coils laden with an insulating layer of dust and dirt are much less efficient when transferring heat or cooling to the circulating air. This results in the system having to run longer to provide the desired temperature, which wastes energy. It is so easy to improve that part of the air handling equation by simply using a higher MERV level product. In general, filters up to MERV 11 are primarily focused on protecting equipment.
It is important to note that smaller particles are more difficult to expel from the lungs than larger ones, so removing a higher number of the smallest particles from the supply air is required to improve indoor air quality and human health. A MERV 13 filter removes at least 90 percent of all particles 1.0 – 10.0 microns and under 75 percent of the 0.3 – 1.0 micron particles. A MERV 14 filter also removes at least 90 percent of 1.0 – 10.0 micron particles but also removes between 75 percent – 84.9 percent of 0.3 – 1.0 micron particles as well. This is even better for improving health issues related to indoor air quality! It is noteworthy that the U.S. Green Building Council via the LEED Certification Program identifies MERV 13 as the minimum level required to earn points toward LEED certification.
Remember that all of this improvement is possible without a high price tag in terms of energy consumption. The new products have been designed to specifically work in the range of 0.30 - 0.45 inches of initial static pressure at normal rated airflow (500 fpm). These resistance levels are very close to the 0.25 - 0.35 inch range common with the family of lower efficiency panel filters. The older generation MERV 13 and 14 products generally operated in the range of 0.50 - 0.75 inches. In most cases, this prohibited them from being used to upgrade lower efficiency systems.
Commentary on choosing an air filter wouldn’t be complete without noting that reducing the filter efficiency originally designed for a building is not advisable. The engineering firm that specified the building equipment is normally responsible for setting the filtration level. Reducing that specified level could result in unwanted liability issues.
In conclusion, it is important to use the products that best fit your needs/goals. Talk to a filter expert, pay attention to the MERV level, and make your choices. There is a useful axiom that applies to the use of HVAC air filters. “Good things happen when more efficient filters are used.” Whether for keeping coils and fans cleaner or for improving indoor air quality, the use of better filters is a very good idea!
* Micron - a measurement which equals one millionth of a meter or 1/25,400 of an inch. A human hair is approximately 100 microns in diameter.