Budget cuts and competitive pressures have reduced building maintenance staffs in many public and private enterprises. This frequently results in a reprioritization of activities, forcing concentration on addressing issues that are required to be fixed at the moment. Repair items such as an HVAC drive system operating in bypass mode may be considered only a nuisance to be dealt with as time permits. And of course, time seldom permits.
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVEConsider the rationale for installing VFDs over the past 10-15 years to control the airflow in buildings. These drives were originally installed to replace the throttling systems designed to regulate flow of air in the system. While throttling reduced the flow, the motor still ran at nearly full load speed and in some cases worked even harder to overcome the added system restriction. By reducing the speed of the motor, the variable-speed drive ensures no more energy than necessary is used to achieve the required flow.
For example, in theory, a fan running at half speed consumes only one-eighth of the energy compared to one running at full speed. Field experience has shown that when the effect of static back pressure is factored in, the relationship is somewhere between one-fourth and one-eighth of the energy consumed at full speed, depending on the mechanical application.
Recent studies indicate that 8-12 percent of HVAC drive systems are running in a bypass mode due to a drive fault. The intent of a bypass contactor is for use in case of a drive failure. It is a short-term emergency service. It was never intended to be a long-term solution for a drive malfunction. While the misapplication of long-term use is understandable due to increased pressures on typically undermanned building maintenance organizations, there are proven approaches to solving this pressing problem.
Why worry about this now? Energy costs continue to soar. Between 1999 and 2004 electricity costs increased by nearly 15 percent, according the Department of Energy (DOE). When VFDs were purchased for the application, the additional costs were justified based on saving money and improving profitability by using less energy for HVAC air handling in the building. As an example of how long term use of bypass contactors affects energy costs, if 10 percent of the drives are in bypass mode, up to 56 percent more energy can be consumed by the air-handling system. This is based on the assumption of all motors being the same size, and all HVAC systems are operating on average at 50 percent flow.
NEXT STEPSThe path forward presents two clear choices. First, do nothing and continue to lose increasing amounts of money every day as additional VFD systems periodically fail and go into bypass operation. Second, develop a program that will change the way drives are proactively maintained.
A typical preventative maintenance program is centered on the following activities:
1. Review the situation. Utilize either an outside or internal resource person to inventory the drives in the building or complex to gather the following information:
2. Replace or repair all of the drives operating in the bypass mode to begin realizing the original energy savings. It is important to work with a supplier that demonstrates the capability to easily replace or repair drives. Select one that will assist in the maintenance and support on an ongoing basis.
3. Create or contract a preventative maintenance program that focuses on the specific issues of drives and how to keep them up and running. These activities typically include, but are not limited to:
With the VFD de-energized
With the VFD re-energized
4. Replace older and highly critical drives before they fail. When a drive is over 10 years old and/or in a demanding and highly critical application, consideration should be given to replacing it before failure. Even with the cost of a new drive and installation, the benefits will include lower operating costs and improved client comfort. Simple-payback, 10-year-life-cycle-costing, or other financial analysis techniques may be performed to formally evaluate the economics for drive changeout.
CONCLUSIONVFD systems installed in the facility have a proven track record of saving energy costs and improving client comfort. The ability to keep drives running as designed will ensure continued savings and comfortable clients.
A number of significant improvements have been made to present-day VFD systems compared to what was available 10 years ago. Drive sizes and part counts have been reduced along with cost, while increasing performance, quality, and warranty periods. Commonly available features include embedded proportional-integral (PI) control functions that eliminate the need for closed loop output signals from the building automation system (BAS). The PI controller typically includes feedback inverse, square root, and differential control functions on board which lower the costs of HVAC control system installation and wiring.
VFD units now typically combine sophisticated insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBT) power switching with advanced microprocessor logic to reduce audible motor noise and meet accepted power quality standards. A number of communication options are available which can be tailored to a wide variety of BAS data and control formats. Onboard metering of electrical kW and kWh information provides data useful in efficiency and billing calculations.
If you're interested in the four steps above, but in need some guidance on where to start, a complementary facilities audit from ABB Drives will help map out the process and define where energy costs can be lowered. To have an audit conducted by one of their drive experts, call Jeff Miller at 262-780-3865. this audit service is available in most major U.S. metropolitan areas.
For more information, contact Wayne Stebbins at Perigon Engineering at firstname.lastname@example.org or call 704-246-2145.
Publication date: 06/19/2006