These requirements will greatly affect damper manufacturers and engineers, but contractors and building operators must be aware of what the new standards entail and why they are important.
Safety is the number-one concern for contractors in the wake of the new standards. For fire and smoke damper installations, contractors will want to make sure they are installing the safest damper available.
A BATTERY OF TESTSGreenheck (Schofield, WI) was the first manufacturer to have its more popular dampers approved by Underwriters Laboratories (UL) under the new standards. The manufacturer earned the UL rating on its most commonly specified dampers back in April 2001, more than a year before the mandatory deadline.
UL 555 and 555S have been around for some time now; 555 was started back in 1968 and 555S was established in 1983. Over the past 20 years, these two standards have changed and developed. The most recent changes mark the sixth edition of UL 555 and the fourth edition of UL 555S.
According to Greenheck, these changes in the standards are quite significant. A number of new tests must be performed on both types of dampers manufactured after July 1, 2002. These new testing procedures are absent from current dampers certified under the past UL standard.
UL 555 UPDATESOf the two updated standards, UL 555 has the least amount of changed testing procedures that are required. This standard includes four new, mandatory safety tests on dynamic fire dampers.
Dynamic fire dampers are installed in systems where the hvac system continues to operate during a fire. The other damper, known as a static damper, is used in systems where the hvac automatically shuts down if a fire occurs in a building. For UL 555, the new testing only applies to dynamic dampers.
The tests required on the dynamic damper include heated air testing, minimum airflow and pressure requirements, and airflow directional testing.
First, all dynamic dampers must be tested at elevated temperatures of 250 degrees or 350 degrees F. This will simulate a fire emergency and test whether the damper will shut under extreme temperatures. According to Greenheck, this heated air must then pass through the damper. The heated air should then trigger a fusible link or electronic sensor, which will cause the damper to close. The current UL standard only makes it mandatory to closure test the damper under ambient temperature.
“This test is used to simulate a real-life condition, to make sure the damper operates correctly,” said Mike Wolf, Greenheck’s sales and marketing manager of dampers and louvers.
Also required is a check on airflow velocity and pressure rating levels. Dynamic dampers must have an airflow velocity rating level of 2,000, 3,000, or 4,000 feet per minute (fpm). They must also have a pressure rating level of 4, 6, or 8 in. wg.
To obtain one of the airflow ratings, the damper must be able to continue functioning at an airflow of 400 fpm higher than the given rating. Also, for a given pressure rating, the damper must be able to remain closed with a 0.5 in. wg higher than the actual rating. For example, to achieve an airflow velocity rating of 3,000 fpm, the damper must remain closed at a velocity of 3,400 fpm. For a 6-in.-wg rating, the damper must stay closed at least with 6.5 in. wg of pressure.
Finally, the airflow tests must be conducted through the front of the damper and through the back. According to Wolf, this alleviates a problem associated with the smoke or fire damper being installed incorrectly. If the damper is installed backwards, it will still be able to block fire or smoke in an emergency.
UL 555S UPDATESUL 555S requires the same testing as UL 555 and then some. Smoke dampers must also be tested for the same airflow and air pressure rates, must be tested at high temperatures, and must test airflow from both directions.
Smoke dampers must also go through a cycling test. Smoke dampers with two-position actuators must be tested to cycle open and closed 20,000 times compared to the current standard, which only requires 5,000 cycles.
Smoke dampers must also go through a leakage test. The major change here is that to simulate real-life conditions, the testing must be done using heated air. The smoke damper serves as a barrier to stop smoke from traveling to other parts of a building in case of an emergency.
Through the leakage test, smoke dampers will be classified by a leakage level. Past UL standards present four separate leak classifications — Class I being the lowest or best rating, and leakage Class IV being the highest or worst leakage rating. With the new UL 555S, the fourth classification has been dropped.
HOW IT AFFECTS YOUAs stated before, the major effect the new standard has is on manufacturers and their design engineers. Manufacturers of fire, smoke, and fire/smoke dampers must have their products qualified through UL standards by the July 1, 2002 deadline. Manufacturers that fail to meet the deadline may not ship their dampers.
Wolf recommends that contractors become familiar with the new standard and keep the changes in mind.
“The most immediate concern to the contractor is when they are in the quotation stage of a project,” he said. This is important because when bidding on a project or ordering a damper, contractors will want to be confident that their projects meet the latest industry standards.
Awareness of the new UL standards should prompt contractors to request that the dampers they are installing meet the latest standards.
Also, contractors may not want to preorder a damper from a manufacturer for an installation after July 2002. Dampers shipped up to June 30 do not have to meet the new standards, but can be installed.
Finally, it will help contractors to just stay ahead of the game. Contractors with current installation projects will want to install dampers that are already up to the new standard instead of waiting for the deadline.
UL is not making it mandatory for dampers installed before the deadline to be retrofitted, but contractors may want to take advantage of installing the dampers that will be up to the new standard. This will ensure that the dampers they have installed are considered to be the safest (according to UL standards).
It will also save on a possible reinstallation if building owners decide they want their dampers up to the latest code.
Sidebar: ACCA Confronts Ventilation SecurityARLINGTON, VA — As reported last week,The Newsis teaming up with the Air Conditioning Contractors of America (ACCA) to present the “National HVACR System Security Summit,” to be held in Baltimore, MD, on Jan. 26, 2002.
But prior to the development of the summit, ACCA had begun focusing on the issue of bioterrorism and ventilation.
According to Kevin Holland, vice president of communications and information for ACCA, the association has received an overwhelming number of questions and concerns from members and consumers about ventilation systems and the danger posed by bioterrorism. That is why ACCA has formed its “Environmental Systems Security Task Force.”
“The task force will gather information and serve as a clearinghouse for members,” said Holland.
Formed about a month ago, the task force is now in the information-gathering stage. The next order of business for the task force will be to participate in the summit in January.
National ACCA president Larry Taylor appointed Lee Rosenberg, past ACCA president, to chair the group. Other members of the task force include: Tony Shaker, executive vice president of Emcor; John DeLillo, executive director of the Greater New York ACCA; Bob Wasniewski of Roberts Environmental Control Corporation; Alan Barnes, president and ceo of Aircond in Atlanta, GA; Hugh Joyce, founder of James River Heating and Air Conditioning; and Stan Peregoy of Calvert-Jones Co. Inc.
Rosenberg says that the ventilation issue is complex. There are a number of issues that intertwine and branch off from the protection issue, he says.
The task force has already been gathering information from manufacturers, contractors, organizations such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and many more. But Rosenberg says that the group is still learning.
Rosenberg hopes that members of the task force can find and disseminate information that will be valuable to the industry.
“We want to give contractors a source of good, credible information,” said Holland.
If the summit is a success, more gatherings could be scheduled for locations across the country, said Rosenberg.
For more information on the task force and the upcoming security summit, go to www.acca.org (website) or www.achrnews.com (website).
Publication date: 12/24/2001