In January, we looked at one of the most commonly used formulas (Formula 1) in hydronic heating design:

##
**Formula 1**

Q = 500 x f x ΔT

Btuh = 500 x gpm x ΔT

Formula 1 represents this equation using symbols, which gives us the following:

Where:

Q = rate of heat transfer (Btuh)

f = flow rate (gpm)

ΔT = temperature change (ΔF)

500 = fluid factor based on water as the system fluid

This formula can be used to determine the rate of heat transfer whenever the fluid flow rate and temperature change across a device, such as a boiler, heat pump, or heat emitter, are known. For example, assume a flow meter indicates that water is passing through a boiler at 10.5 gpm. A thermometer on the inlet of the boiler reads 135°F and another on the boiler outlet reads 154°. Formula 1 can also be used to estimate the rate of heat transfer into the water, as shown in Formula 1a.

##
**Formula 1a**

Q = 500 x f x ΔT = 500 x 10.5 x (154–135) = 99,750 Btuh

This formula would give the same result if the boiler inlet temperature was 95° and the outlet temperature was 114°. The ΔT of 114°–95° is still 19°. In other words, it’s the change in temperature across the device (rather than how hot the fluid is), in combination with flow rate, that determines the rate of heat transfer.

Another example would be reading the flow rate of a radiant floor tubing circuit at 1.1 gpm on a manifold flow meter, combined with a known supply temperature of 110° and a circuit return temperature of 93.5°. The rate of heat output of the circuit would be as estimated in Formula 1b.

##
**Formula 1b**

Q = 500 x 1.1 x (110-93.5) – 9,075 Btuh

If you know both flow rate and ΔT, you can quickly estimate the rate of heat transfer to or from any device that’s part of a hydronic system.

Many of you know the rule of thumb that 1 gpm of water flow can carry 10,000 Btuh along for the ride. This is based on Formula 1, when a temperature drop of 20° is assumed.

##
**Formula 2**

Q = 500 x f x (20) = 10,000 x f

**In Formula 2:**

Q = rate of heat transfer (Btuh)

f = flow rate of water (gpm)

Remember that Formula 2 only applies when a circuit operates with a 20° temperature drop. It also only applies when the heat transfer fluid is water. Beyond these constraints, the formula has even more assumptions built into it.

**When It’s Not 500**

The number 500 in Formulas 1 and 2 is based on the specific heat and density of the fluid being circulated, as well as some unit conversion factors. A more thermodynamically complete version of Formula 1 is shown in Formula 3.

##
**Formula 3**

Q = (8.01 x D x c) x f x ΔT

**In Formula 3:**

Q = rate of heat transfer (Btuh)

8.01 = unit conversion factor

D = density of fluid used (pounds per cubic foot)

c = specific heat of fluid used (Btu per pound per Farenheit degree)

f = flow rate of water (gpm)

ΔT = temperature change of fluid (ΔF)

##
**Formula 4**

Btuh = (lb/ft3)(Btu/lb. x °F) x (gallon/minute) x (1 ft.3/7.49 gallon) x (60 minute/1 hour)(°F/1)

Formula 4 shows the customary American units associated with the quantities in Formula 3. Notice that two conversion factors, shown in red, are needed to make the results come out with units of Btuh. These two numbers, 60 divided by 7.49, are what result in the number 8.01 in Formula 3.

If you think back to math class, identical quantities that appear in both the top and bottom of fractions cancel each other out. If you do this with Formula 4, you end up with the same units (e.g., Btuh) on both sides of the equals sign. That’s absolutely necessary for the formula to be valid.

Formula 3 can be used with any fluid, provided the units are those stated, and that the density and specific heat of the fluid can be determined. Keep in mind the density and specific heat of any fluid change with the temperature of that fluid.

The density of water at 60° is 62.355 pounds per cubic foot, and its specific heat at 60° is 0.99987 Btu per pound per degree Farenheit. Putting these numbers into Formula 3 and simplifying yields results in Btuh = (499.4) x f x ΔT.

The value of 500 in Formula 1 comes from rounding off the 499.4. However, this value is based on the density and specific heat of water at 60°, which is quite low, relative to where most hydronic heating systems operate.

To better reflect the true heat transport properties of water and other fluids, the density and specific heat values used in Formula 3 should be based on the average temperature of the system fluid under design load conditions. For example, if the boiler supplies 140° water to a distribution system and the return temperature is 120°, then the density and specific heat should be determined at the average water temperature of 130°.

To give you an idea of how things change, I’ve evaluated the product of density x specific heat x 8.01, which I will call the “fluid factor” for water and some antifreeze solutions, and shown the results in Table 1 (above, rounded to the nearest whole number). For values at other temperatures, use the graph in Figure 1 (above). In both cases, the units on the fluid factor are Btuh per gpm per degree Farenheit.

You can see that the changes in the fluid factor (density x specific heat x 8.01) are relatively small for a given fluid over the temperature range given. However, the fluid factor is noticeably different for different fluids. This is mainly due to the pronounced drop in specific heat of glycol solutions at higher concentrations.

Using the correct value of the fluid factor is especially important when designing glycol-based systems, such as those used in snow melting or solar thermal systems.

So does the number 500 still have a place in hydronic system design? Sure it does. When the system fluid is water, it’s a lot easier to make quick mental calculations using 500 instead of 494.

Estimating using the 500 factor certainly gets you in the ballpark. It’s also likely that other design or installation decisions could affect system performance more than using the nontemperature-adjusted value of the fluid factor for a given fluid type. However, if you’re using a calculator, spreadsheet, or other computational tool, you should use the most accurate numbers possible. It’s just part of being a professional.

Publication date: 3/17/2014

**Want more HVAC industry news and information? Join The NEWS on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn today!**

## Report Abusive Comment