- Residential Market
- Light Commercial Market
- Commercial Market
- Indoor Air Quality
- Components & Accessories
- Residential Controls
- Commercial Controls
- Testing, Monitoring, Tools
- Services, Apps & Software
- Standards & Legislation
- EXTRA EDITION
It’s a hospital facility engineer’s nightmare: All of the patient rooms and many key surgical suites of a health care building are served by a single vaneaxial fan. That fan and its drive motor are in a penthouse structure. Consulting engineers estimate it would take up to a week or more to remove and replace them in the event of a motor failure. Such an event would shut down the medical center.
That’s what worried Rick Barney, project supervisor, Sutter Roseville Medical Center in Roseville, Calif. What happened next is a blueprint for vastly improving airside plant reliability, while keeping the required air handler in service. The Sutter Roseville Medical Center is a modern, 350,000-square-foot facility that provides a wide range of medical and surgical services to the Roseville area, northeast of Sacramento.
ELIMINATING RISK OF FAN FAILUREThe challenge facing Barney at the facility was to eliminate the risk that went with a fan failure, which could effectively shut down the entire patient tower. With a novel design approach, this conversion was accomplished with no interruption of patient service or comfort. Two Fanwall® multiple fan arrays were moved into place and installed one unit at a time while the original fan stayed in service.
The Fanwall modules, which are capable of passing through standard-width doorways, were small enough to fit into position without major building demolition. The project required construction of a platform and a reconfigured plenum and duct system such that with quick removal of a few panels, the new system could temporarily flow air through and later around the existing vaneaxial fan until it could be removed. At a later date, the old fan was then dismantled and removed in increments after the new fan system was on line.
MUCH OF FACILITY AT RISKIn recent years, it had become a matter of growing concern to Barney that the air-handling system that served all the patient rooms, and many of the treatment suites in the hospital, was served by a single 139,000-cfm vaneaxial fan, operating at 6.9 inches of total static pressure. The single fan motor is rated at 250 hp, and weighs 2,500 pounds. The system was installed when the medical center was built in 1996. A variable pitch blade design allowed airflow adjustment. Barney noted that the fan and its drive motor had not yet given any problems.
However, he indicated that in the event of a fan motor failure, the medical center would need to move all of its patients, including those in critical care areas, to other facilities. “We felt this was unacceptable. We needed to eliminate this risk.” The problem, however, was that the existing fan was part of a built-up penthouse air handler. Dismantling the air handler and moving a replacement unit in could take several weeks. There wasn’t physical space for a large redundant fan and motor system. That’s when the team began considering the Fanwall concept.
THERE'S POTENTIALTony Burg, an area director for Sutter Health, and Dennis Ledbetter, director of plant operations at Sutter Roseville, had seen a demonstration of the Fanwall system and were impressed. Bob Beyer of Norman S. Wright Mechanical Equipment Co., Huntair Inc.’s local sales representative, also called this concept to the attention of Barney at Sutter Roseville. Barney sensed the potential of this type of system, but needed ideas on how to make the conversion while maintaining airflow through the air handler. He brought this challenge to mechanical engineer Scott Karpinen at the Frank M. Booth Design Build Co., Granite Bay, Calif.
Karpinen was familiar with the system but had not personally designed a project with this product. He recognized the special challenges on this job because of the need to maintain airflow in the building during the project. Karpinen said, “The major design challenges as we saw them were keeping the system shutdowns to an absolute minimum, relocating a major supply duct that serves the birthing center at the facility, and designing the structural base to support the Fanwall systems.”
TWO BANKS OF FANSThe system, as designed, included two banks of Fanwall units, each in a five-wide by three-high fan array configuration. “This made the most sense for the space we had to work in,” said Karpinen. The Frank M. Booth team fabricated and assembled the platform in their shop to keep field welding to a minimum. The support platform was then reassembled in place to hold the arrays. They also performed extensive redesign of ductwork and plenum walls, and planned relocation of piping to accommodate the new system.
Work on the project began in April 2008 and was largely complete by July, though individual room air rebalancing continued for several months afterward.
REARRANGEMENT OF SYSTEMTo lift the Fanwall units and other equipment to the rooftop, a crane was brought in on a single occasion. Because of their relatively small size and weight, the new units could be maneuvered easily into the penthouse. In addition to construction of the platform and assembly of the arrays, considerable duct rearrangement was needed. A major duct serving the labor and delivery areas of the hospital was permanently relocated to accommodate the arrays and still provide access through the mechanical room.
Once the platform was installed, a series fan system was developed, with the arrays upstream of the cooling coil and the existing vaneaxial downstream. This provided continuous airflow for the facility while the new fans were installed and wired. Once the arrays were operational, the existing fan was shut down and the facility was able to test the new fan system with the vaneaxial still in place. Once testing of the new fans was complete, the vaneaxial and custom sound traps were dismantled and removed in increments.
According to Barney, the removal of the fan and motor was then done during times when only minimal airflow was required and the crews could work within the plenum. He added, “They did not use any cutting torches - just reciprocating saws, hacksaws, and wrenches. They took it apart one piece at a time.”
MORE BENEFITS OF FAN REDUNDANCYBarney explained that the most important benefits they see from the project are the tremendous redundancy in fan capacity, and drop in energy use, but there are other benefits as well. “With the old fan, at times we were up to about 98 percent of fan capacity, and had little remaining room to add to the facility. With the new design, our maximum is at about 79 percent, so we have surplus capacity without enlarging the fan room.” The new system has variable-speed drives for all the fans, so the exact airflow requirement can be met.
The installed system ties in with the building’s Siemens Talon building automation system. Barney explained, “With the arrangement of the Fanwall units, we can observe and adjust airflow patterns very closely. This helps us optimize the overall operation of the system.”
Acoustic improvement, though not a major issue because of the penthouse location, is another benefit. Barney noted that the fan units are quieter, so less fan noise is transmitted downstream. “The difference is noticeable,” he said.
SIGNIFICANT ENERGY SAVINGS“We also saw a reduction in the energy requirement for the Fanwall system,” according to Karpinen. “We were able to remove the custom sound traps, operate at a higher airflow rate and static pressure, and still see a reduction of 35 hp in fan horsepower.”
Dave Benson, president, Huntair Inc., noted, “We calculated a 43 percent savings in energy use by switching to a Fanwall array, and that was just delivering the original airflow. After ramping up to a higher airflow, and operating against a higher design static pressure, the Fanwall array still requires less BHP and has a lower connected load.”
Overall, Barney said the experience of Sutter Roseville Medical Center had with the project was very positive. “We worked with a team to meet a significant engineering and operational challenge, and are happy with the results.”
Publication Date: 06/15/2009