the NEWS
  Home
  About the NEWS
  Subscription Info
  e-Newsletters
  Contact Us
  Dealer Design Products
  Resources
  Archived Editorial
  Blogs
  Career Center
  Columns
  Distributor Corner
  Calendar of Events
  HVACR Directory
  Industry Links
  Learning Center
  Manufacturer Reports
  Regional Reports
  Reprints
  Survey Says
  Training Track
  Webinars
  AEC Store
  Market Research
  Extra Edition
  HVACR Forum
  Legal forum
  Business Management
  Dot Comment
  Energy Matters
  Features
  Reader Mail
  Newsline
  People
  The Hotline
  Service & Maintenance
  Technical
  Advertising
  Ad Index
  Media Kit
  Submit Press Release
  Services
  Classifieds
  Digital Edition
  How To Corner
  Post Cards
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Noise Reduction
by Neil Simon
March 10, 2008

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShareshare Use

Tips From the Motor Doctor


Dealing with a user’s complaint of a noisy motor can be a frustrating experience. After all, the perception of noise is extremely subjective (just ask the parents of teenagers). Not only does the range of human hearing differ considerably among people, but it also varies by specific frequency.

Another frustration is that noise is not an easy condition to measure. Part of that difficulty goes back to the subjective perception of noise. A more technical reason is that noise is the perceived result of a complex interaction of sound waves. Measuring noise can be like measuring chaos.

All noise has a mechanical origin, which is to say it is the result of waves of pressure transmitted through air as the result of the mechanical movement of some object. In a motor, the sources of mechanical noise are numerous:

• So-called “electrical noise” is the result of mechanical pressure produced when the parts of a motor that can be magnetized are attracted and repelled from one another. This happens when the magnetic field that drives the motor alternates.

• Another source of noise is inherent in a motor’s relationship to both the mechanical and electrical effects of spinning parts moving through the air gap.

• Additionally, since the motor has a spinning internal part (namely, the rotor) imbalances are transferred to the frame of the motor as noise.

Noise inherent in a motor generally cannot be “cured” by the motor installer. But short of specifying a low-noise motor for the application, there are several things the savvy installer can do to minimize the effects of inherent motor noise.

The first course of action is fairly straightforward — isolation. Inherent noise is very efficiently transferred to the motor’s frame through its mechanical parts. Isolation breaks that efficient path to the motor-driven device. You can isolate the motor in several ways, such as using rubber motor pads, soft couplings, and/or resilient cradles.

There’s a second course of action that you need to consider when the first step fails to produce the desired result. This is based on the concept of harmonics. Harmonics are a set of specific frequencies that noisy mechanical equipment tends to favor as vibration frequencies. Unfortunately, harmonic frequencies are not easy to calculate, as they are the result of complex interactions of speed, mass, and separation (or the distance between moving assemblies).

Though difficult to calculate, you can deal with the effect of harmonic frequencies effectively by changing the speed, mass, or separation distance of the motor-driven apparatus. For example, in a belt-driven application, pulley diameters could be changed to vary the speed of the driven load. Slight increases or decreases in speed from the unit’s designed point could move the motor out of the harmonic frequency. Sometimes changing the density (hardness) of isolation devices, such as the rubber pads or resilient rings, is enough to move a mechanical assembly off a harmonic frequency. Where space and application permit, changing the length of the train of driven equipment can also move that equipment off a harmonic frequency.

Although subjective, motor noise is often the cause for callbacks by unhappy customers. Many times, you can solve the problem easily with isolation. But when the noise persists, a working knowledge of harmonic frequencies may mean the difference between a happy customer and an unhappy one.

Publication date: 03/10/2008


Neil Simon
aka the Motor Doctor, is regional sales manager for A.O. Smith Electrical Products Co. For more information, visit www.aosmithmotors.com.

Links


Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.

Click here for more information.

The Breakthrough of the Scroll Compressor

October 15, 2007

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



The first Copeland Scroll® rolled off the production line in 1987, and the cooling industry was changed in a way that would benefit contractors and their customers in many, many ways. The prime benefits have been efficiency and product reliability.

Many features of the Scroll focus on preventing compressor failures, but the Scroll’s primary design also improves efficiency and reliability thanks to its classic, concentric compression scroll, in which one spiral-shaped part fits into another; the space between the two parts contains crescent-shaped gas pockets.


CLASSIC SCROLL OPERATION

In operation, one Scroll is fixed in place while the other orbits within the first. The refrigerant gas is drawn in by the movement and forced toward the center of the scroll through successively smaller pockets, thereby increasing the gas pressure until it reaches its maximum pressure. Then it’s released through a discharge port in the fixed scroll.

Copeland Scroll compressors are unique in the industry because they feature both axial and radial compliance in their design, whereas other scroll models utilize a mechanically fixed design and scroll tip seals.

Axial compliance refers to the ability of the scrolls to separate in the axial — or vertical — direction remaining in continuous contact around an axis, in all normal operating conditions, ensuring minimal leakage without the use of tip seals. Radial compliance refers to the ability of the scroll flanks to separate. These features of the Scroll design allow the compressor to be more tolerant of liquid refrigerant or debris than other technologies, making for a compressor that is extremely durable and reliable.

The combination of axial and radial compliance means that Scroll compressors actually “wear in” rather than wearing out. Continuous flank contact, maintained by centrifugal force, also minimizes gas leakage and maximizes efficiency of the compressor.

Next month: Tech Tips will begin examining the Scroll’s improved reliability through its oil control system.

For more information, click on the Emerson Climate Technologies logo above.



Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.
© 2008 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy