the NEWS
Advertisement:
HVACR Directory | Extra Edition | Learning Center | Editorial Blogs | Product Gallery
  Home
  About the NEWS
  Subscription Info
  e-Newsletters
  Contact Us
  Resources
  Archived Editorial
  Blogs
  Career Center - Employers
  Career Center - Job Seekers
  Columns
  Distributor Corner
  Calendar of Events
  HVACR Directory
  Industry Links
  Learning Center
  Letters
  Manufacturer Reports
  Regional Reports
  Reprints
  Survey Says
  Training Track
  Webinars
  AEC Store
  Market Research
  Extra Edition
  HVACR Forum
  Legal forum
  Business Management
  Dot Comment
  Energy Matters
  Features
  Newsline
  People
  Service Hotline
  Service & Maintenance
  Technical
  Advertising
  Ad Index
  Media Kit
  Submit Press Release
  Services
  Classifieds
  Digital Edition
  Post Cards
spacer
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Ineos Wins Patent Dispute

January 12, 2009

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



ST. GABRIEL, La. — Ineos Fluor Americas LLC announced that Chief Administrative Law Judge Paul Luckern of the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), issued an initial determination finding that Sinochem’s R-134a infringes on Ineos Fluor’s patent.

Three months ago, Sinochem, headquartered in Beijing, signed a consent order under which it agreed to cease U.S. imports and the sale of certain of its R-134a products within the United States. The company, however, continued to claim that its remaining R-134a imports did not infringe on Ineos Fluor’s patent. The judge’s decision confirmed Ineos’ position on the patent matter and his initial determination includes a recommendation that the ITC enter an exclusion order barring Sinochem’s imports and sales of all of its R-134a in the United States.

“Ineos is committed to vigorously protecting its intellectual property,” said Peter Geosits, Ineos Fluor Americas’ commercial director. “We are delighted with the judge’s decision. It is a testament to the diligent work by the developers of the world’s leading process for producing R-134a and to the dedication of our St. Gabriel, La., employees to the safe and efficient manufacture of this product today.”

An exclusion order issued by the ITC will make it unlawful for Sinochem to import or sell R-134a, made by either of its manufacturing processes, in the United States for the life of Ineos Fluor’s patent.”

For more information, visit www.ineos.com.

Publication date: 01/12/2009


|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.





© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy
Your Feedback