the NEWS
Advertisement:
HVACR Directory | Extra Edition | Learning Center | Editorial Blogs | Product Gallery
  Home
  About the NEWS
  Subscription Info
  e-Newsletters
  Contact Us
  Resources
  Archived Editorial
  Blogs
  Career Center - Employers
  Career Center - Job Seekers
  Columns
  Distributor Corner
  Calendar of Events
  HVACR Directory
  Industry Links
  Learning Center
  Letters
  Manufacturer Reports
  Regional Reports
  Reprints
  Survey Says
  Training Track
  Webinars
  AEC Store
  Market Research
  Extra Edition
  HVACR Forum
  Legal forum
  Business Management
  Dot Comment
  Energy Matters
  Features
  Newsline
  People
  Service Hotline
  Service & Maintenance
  Technical
  Advertising
  Ad Index
  Media Kit
  Submit Press Release
  Services
  Classifieds
  Digital Edition
  Post Cards
spacer
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Letters: 03/02/2009

March 2, 2009

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Items Have No Place in an Economic Stimulus Package

Advertisement:

For more info, click here
[Editor’s note: Specific points in the following letter on the congressional stimulus package are concerning the package at the time the letter was written, and do not necessarily reflect specific points that remained in the package thereafter.]

I am deeply disappointed in the lack of fiscal responsibility exhibited by members of the House and Senate. The American people deserve better. When we elected them, we expected that they would demand better of their colleagues and hold them accountable for their obligation to “The People.”

The current stimulus package has been loaded with pet provisions that highlight the irresponsibility of our elected officials.

Unfortunately, it underscores the rationale to distrust politicians. The spending of billions of taxpayer dollars on provisions that will not create jobs should be removed from the ill-conceived stimulus package.

Some of the wasteful provisions include:

• $2 billion in earmarks to restart FutureGen, a near-zero emissions coal power plant in Illinois that the Department of Energy defunded last year because it said the project was inefficient;

• $246 million in tax breaks for Hollywood movie producers to buy motion picture film;

• $650 million for the digital television converter box coupon program;

• $88 million for the Coast Guard to design a new polar icebreaker (arctic ship);

• $448 million for constructing the Department of Homeland Security headquarters;

• $248 million for furniture at the new Homeland Security headquarters;

• $600 million to buy hybrid vehicles for federal employees; and

• $400 million for the Centers for Disease Control to screen and prevent STDs.

This type of spending of our tax dollars is an outrage. We need more common sense in Washington.

We need a drastic shift in thinking, we need less government. I just put our entire workforce of 430 associates on a four-day work week to control costs and maintain operating margins. The government should act the same. Cutting government in half is a good start.

Jon S. DeArment
Vice President Mfg. & Eng.
Channellock Inc.
Meadville, Pa.


Personal Opinions Don’t Count in Science

[Editor’s note: This letter is in response to Raymond Wilson’s letter, “Contractors, Governmental Global Warming Rules,” Feb. 2.]

Mr. Wilson’s letter stated that the global warming debate is not over because 30,000 scientists were willing to sign a petition saying that they do not believe there is evidence to support global warming. The Global Warming Petition Project has been around since 1999. The petition is based on the premise that because people have degrees in science, their opinions are valid.

Science is about development and testing of theories against real data. It is not about personal opinions. Unless people are specialists in climate science and have worked in the field, their opinions have no scientific validity.

The ramifications of global warming are too important for our industry to let misinformation go unchallenged.

McLouis Robinet
Retired scientist (physicist)
Oak Park, Ill.


Send correspondence via e-mail to letters@achrnews.com.

Publication date: 03/02/2009


|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.





© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy
Your Feedback