the NEWS
Advertisement:
HVACR Directory | Extra Edition | Learning Center | Editorial Blogs | Product Gallery
  Home
  About the NEWS
  Subscription Info
  e-Newsletter
  Contact Us
  Resources
  Archived Editorial
  Blogs
  Career Center - Employers
  Career Center - Job Seekers
  Columns
  Distributor Corner
  Calendar of Events
  HVACR Directory
  Industry Links
  Learning Center
  Letters
  Manufacturer Reports
  Regional Reports
  Newsline
  Reprints
  Survey Says
  Training Track
  Webinars
  AEC Store
  Market Research
  Extra Edition
  Business Management
  Service & Maintenance
  Technical
  Advertising
  Ad Index
  Media Kit
  Submit Press Release
  Services
  eProduct Info
  Classifieds
  Digital Edition
  List Rental
  Post Cards
spacer
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
A-Game Tactics: Kennedy Death Clouds Climate Future
by Angela D. Harris
September 7, 2009

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Sadly, not all those who left the Senate for the 2009 summer recess will return Sept. 8, but nevertheless, the Senate will return and they have their work cut out for them.

Soon after their arrival, debate on HR 2454 American Clean Energy and Security Acts of 2009 will continue. Narrowly passed in the House, HR 2454 lost a strong supporter with the death of Sen. Edward “Ted” Kennedy, D-Mass.

A special election for his seat must be held within the next 145 to 160 days, but the Senate is not going to delay its schedule to fill the empty seat.

Operating now with 99 Senators, as opposed to 100, doesn’t sound like much of a deficit for the upcoming climate bill; however, the voting margins are so tight; it is possible that the one vote lost could defeat the bill.

According to www.grist.org, as of the end of August, there were approximately 33 likely supporters, 28 likely opponents, and 38 undecided/unknowns.

The Senate needs 51 votes to pass the legislation and they are feeling the pressure from the House and the Obama Administration.

This is where Carol Browner — officially known as the assistant to the President for energy and climate change and popularly known as the White House climate czar — comes into play.

According to Newsweek, “She’s the go-to arm twister: the person who wooed House members and counted votes to narrowly pass the climate-change bill on June 26 in the House, 219 to 212.”

The fate of HR 2454 is still unknown, but with Kennedy gone, its destiny is a little cloudier.


Angela D. Harris
eMedia Development Specialist. E-mail her at angelaharris@achrnews.com.

|PrintEmail
  Comments (3)Post a Comment
Title: Celebrating May Be Premature


While what you say about the fate of the climate bill currently in Congress seems reasonable, let's not forget that other possible avenues for regulating HFC's are currently in the hopper. Among them is direct EPA action, bypassing Congress altogether. The Obama admin. has major leverage there if it choose to use it.
Secondly, and really something likely in my opinion, will be action through the Montreal Protocol to limit and phase out HFC's. This approach is preferred as I understand it by the chemical manufacturers themselves.
So, since the regulation of HFC's is probably this Industries biggest concern in regard to the Climate Bill I'd say celebrating may just be premature.


Title: Celebrating Is Not on The Agenda


You are right Joe, the fate of the climate bill is in some jeopardy, but it is far from time to celebrate. In fact, celebrating is not even on my agenda. It appears from some of my research, that Obama would like to accomplish his climate goals via Congressional legislation, however, he doesn't have too many qualms about a top-down approach via the EPA. I believe the bottom line for this administration is December in Copenhagen. If Obama can't get America to commit to reducing its carbon percentages then he doesn't have a leg to stand on with China and India, who are far worse "global warming offenders" than we are.
I guess Carl Browner is just going to have to do a little more "arm twisting" than she originally intended, either that, or we might be getting another czar...


Title: Additional HFC Input


Did you notice the U.S., Canada and Mexico signed a treaty(subject to individual country ratification I'm sure)
Sept 16th agreeing to regulate HFC's through the Montreal Protocol. Also, as reported in this web-page the EPA will began requiring large emitters of HFC's( and other greenhouse gasses) reporting beginning Jan 2010.
Likely, with little progress in the U.S. Congress, HFCs(low hanging fruit) will be on the agenda for Copenhagen in December. The U.S. is going to be under considerable pressure to provide some kind of leadership, some way.
What do you think?


 
 


Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.








© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy
Your Feedback