Heightened sensitivity to the dependability of our power supply

Reliability of power supply is a real — and growing —concern. A survey of 250 energy managers indicates that 25% of companies experience regular power outages. These power disruptions can be costly: 18% of responding companies had experienced an outage that cost $100,000 or more. A full 71% of them indicated that they already own or are considering alternative power sources as a result.

The key barrier to achieving reliable power supply is either an immature or aging grid. For instance, in India, where more than 240 million people still lack access to power, 50% of electricity generation is wasted due to poor transmission to rural areas as well as power theft.

And in the U.S., the older, centralized grid would cost billions of dollars to upgrade or replace. It has already increased delivery costs by 14% in the last decade. The 2017 grid reliability study commissioned by the U.S. Department of Energy found that, while recent increases in the penetration of renewable energy generation do not threaten the reliability of power, the need to create transmission infrastructure to support expansion in renewables could be significant.

The solution to reliability doesn’t rest in stockpiling coal to support conventional baseload generation, as some have suggested; this is actually risky. During Hurricane Harvey, grid operators in Texas had to switch from coal-fired generation to natural gas due to the coal’s level of water saturation. Instead, the key to the reliability problem is an integrated, active approach to energy management that enables resilience with its diversity of supply and demand. Rather than treating the procurement, dispensation, and evolution of energy as disparate activities, the Active Energy Management approach assumes that these activities are interdependent and indispensable.

Active Energy Management leads to reliability and resilience

By addressing operational efficiency, enabled by digitization and technology, operators can reduce susceptibility to outages and potential downtime. Strategically sourcing energy supply from a diverse portfolio that includes renewable generation reduces risk while maximizing continuity. Investing in new energy opportunities and distributed energy resources (DERs) — like demand response, battery storage, smart grid technologies, fuel cells, combined heat and power, and distributed solar — can further the development of corporate assets that are responsive, agile, and reliable.

The happy result is both cost and carbon savings. Reductions in resource consumption from efficiency projects lower carbon emissions and the money saved can be used to fund sustainability projects. Once a cost center, clean, green, and renewable electricity is now cheaper than conventional generation in more than 60 countries, and will be the most inexpensive source of power everywhere by 2020. DERs continue to drive savings by allowing organizations to store power to use during peak load times and by reducing transmission utility charges.

DERs are on the rise

As more entities embark on the Active Energy Management journey and explore the flexibility of DERs, the growing deployment of microgrids will become inevitable to achieve grid autonomy. A self-contained, localized grid that typically includes a combination of generation and storage assets, microgrids can both integrate with existing grids or operate independently in “island mode.” This flexibility and reliance on DERs makes them the epitome of true energy resilience.

Microgrids can be used as stand-alone power generation sources — as they are in both rural or off-grid electrification, or disconnected, remote geographies — or as backup power stations that ensure continuity of critical systems. And new financing models, such as microgrids-as-a-service, mean that companies can invest in a system without any upfront costs.

As an example, Schneider Electric client Montgomery County, Maryland, installed microgrids at its public safety headquarters and correctional facility to modernize critical systems as part of the county’s efforts to improve resilience. Schneider Electric itself has also invested in a microgrid at the company’s Boston One Campus, where the system is expected to produce 10% of the campus’s electricity needs at a 20% reduction in cost.

Market trends don’t match corporate action

Despite the advantages of Active Energy Management and its role in improving reliability and resilience, corporate intention lags implementation. A recent study conducted by GreenBiz and Schneider Electric found that while 82% of respondents have initiated energy efficiency upgrades, only 30% are planning projects directly related to resilience, and a mere 1% have considered or implemented energy storage solutions.

Pursuing Active Energy Management and its range of distributed energy solutions can help businesses and communities future-proof themselves against energy disruption and the inevitable energy transition. Reducing energy consumption, diversifying energy supply to include renewables, and investing in evolving clean technologies like microgrids creates valuable redundancies in power supply that reduce the value of lost load, especially for power critical industries like data centers, health care, and air transportation.

To learn more about the evolving role of new energy opportunities, such as microgrids, we invite you to read this Schneider Electric white paper.

Editor’s Note: This article originally appeared on Schneider Electric’s blog. See the article in its entirety by clicking here.