A2Ls are often considered comparable to A3s (such as R-290) inasmuch as they share some common characteristics. Both can achieve very low global warming potential (GWP) levels yet still present a degree of flammability, but unlike R-290, A2Ls are synthetic hydrofluoroolefin (HFO) and hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) blends or pure HFO refrigerants that have unique performance characteristics.

In the past, a number of operators felt that potential safety concerns often overshadowed R-290’s many positive performance and environmental characteristics. But for those willing to look past its flammability, R-290 — and the modern refrigeration systems designed to address its safety concerns — offers several unique advantages:

• It is a naturally occurring hydrocarbon (non-synthetic refrigerant);
• It boasts a GWP of 3 and an ozone depletion potential (ODP) of 0;
• It offers excellent thermodynamic properties and energy efficiencies; and
• It’s globally recognized as a leading alternative to HFC refrigerants.

Charge limits drive system design

Traditionally, one of the primary challenges of designing an R-290 system was adhering to the universally accepted standard of 150 grams. This standard dictated small charges, resulting in the production of smaller, stand-alone systems, such as reach-in coolers with built-in refrigeration systems that are charged and sealed at the factory. This charge limitation also placed restrictions on refrigeration system capacity or the possibility of designing larger, R-290 based systems that could remotely service multiple refrigerated cases.

The prospect of increasing R-290’s charge limit has been actively discussed in food service and food retail markets for many years. But with the IEC recently approving an increase in charge limits for A3 and A2L refrigerants — to 500 g and 1,200 g, respectively — the potential for expanding the application and capacity ranges of these HFC alternatives is now on the rise.

It’s important to understand that while the IEC provides safe refrigerant use guidance internationally, the U.S. still relies on the Underwriters Laboratories’ (UL) codes and standards to establish guidelines on the safe use of A3s and A2Ls. Currently, the UL is conducting tests with A3s and A2Ls to help evaluate their safe use in self-contained equipment and the potential for charge limit increases. So, while the IEC safety standard update impacts equipment produced for global markets, the R-290 charge limit in the U.S. will remain at 150 g until the UL issues new guidelines.

In terms of timing, UL has indicated that it likely will begin the process of updating its flammable refrigerant safety standard later this year. Although a number of industry experts are predicting that any UL charge limit increase may be smaller than the levels established in the IEC’s recent update, the extent of any possible increase is currently unknown. Any increase, however, will expand system design flexibilities and refrigeration capacities compared to the current generation of equipment produced for the U.S. market.

Even so, self-contained cases charged with 150 g, even under current standards, have proven to be viable options for many restaurant chains and operators both in U.S. markets and abroad.

Handling requirements and technician familiarity

Because A3 and A2L refrigerants are flammable, technician familiarity is essential to properly maintain and support these systems and minimize potential danger to technicians, operators, and restaurant patrons. When considering safe handling requirements, it’s important to differentiate between stand-alone systems, such as self-contained reach-ins, and remote systems, such as those used to service a walk-in unit or multiple restaurant fixtures.

Stand-alone units are oftentimes charged and sealed at the manufacturer’s facility and, accordingly, in many applications, they don’t require special handling and installation requirements on-site; in these types of applications, operators typically must simply plug them into an electrical outlet. When there are multiple stand-alone systems in a restaurant, some operators have opted to implement a chilled water loop system that removes the exhaust heat from the units. In areas that now allow for larger charge limits, there’s a potential to use fewer compressors to achieve the same refrigerated load requirements.

However, in remote R-290 applications, which are governed by different safety standards outside of the IEC’s recent update, technicians will have potentially more handling and servicing requirements to ensure proper and safe operation. When dealing with R-290 or other A2L-based equipment, it’s critically important for all technicians to complete proper training prior to servicing and fully understand each application’s safety and operating considerations.

Ensuring safety is the top priority

While it may take some time before the UL updates its own flammable refrigeration safety standards for all U.S. markets, the IEC’s recent move is an indication that global perceptions about R-290 are changing. It also reflects an awareness of the improvements in refrigeration technologies that are helping to mitigate safety concerns and usher in charge level increases.

Ensuring application safety has always been a top priority at Emerson; our R-290 based compressors and condensing units are no exception. We believe it’s important for manufacturers to consider not only applicable UL or IEC standards but also to conduct their own thorough evaluation of potential safety issues.