South / Regional Reports

Texas Contractors, Subcontractors Agree To Rules For Contingent Payment Clause Enforceability

In November 2001, 15 Texas contractors and subcontractors, two lawyers, and a facilitator from North Carolina set out on a quest. They were determined to do what two major segments of the Texas construction industry had not been able to do for decades: establish fair rules for the use of contingent payment clauses in construction subcontracts. The participants were volunteer general contractors from the Texas Building Branch of the Associated General Contractors (AGC) and subcontractors from the Texas Construction Association (TCA), an organization of subcontractor and supplier trade associations.

Contingent payment clauses or “pay if paid” clauses are common risk shifting clauses used to shift or spread the burden of a project owner’s failure to make payment from the general contractor to its subcontractors. In simple terms, the general contractor uses a subcontract term, which says to the subcontractor, “If I don’t get paid by the owner, you don’t get paid”.

Subcontractors have long argued that they lack the information, the resources, or meaningful lines of communication with the project owner to assess such risks, much less to accept them. They cite abuses where general contractors use such clauses as defenses when the general contractor’s own failings are the reason for non-payment.

General contractors argue that market forces, not the legislature, should determine the extent to which they may shift such risks. They argue that subcontractors are even greater beneficiaries of the profits of construction work, and that the risks of such work should be aligned with those who profit from it.

The time-honored tradition of Texas construction industry lobbying has been for the subcontractors to file a bill outlawing such clauses in their entirety. The general contractors, in turn, lobby to have the bill killed. The feelings have run so deep that middle ground has hardly ever been sought. The arguments have been heated, expensive, and seemingly never ending. That is, until now.

The associations sought the help of a neutral facilitator, an experienced construction attorney from another state. Together, they crafted a set of ground rules that would allow both groups to cease their positional bargaining and seek solutions that would be in their common best interests. It worked.

The solution, in the form of a draft bill that the boards of directors of both groups have approved as part of a joint legislative agenda, was surprisingly simple. The right to shift risks of owner insolvency was preserved, but only in a fashion that did not involve the general contractor shifting risks which it could better control, mitigate, or manage itself. Furthermore, the right to shift the risk was reconciled with the state’s “prompt pay” laws, such that a subcontractor would not find itself both at risk of owner insolvency and obligated to continue performance.

The guiding principles of the bill are:

  • A general contractor may shift the risk of owner insolvency.

  • A general contractor may not enforce the clause when the reason for non-payment by an owner is related to the general contractor’s default or mismanagement, or is the fault of another subcontractor.

  • A general contractor may not enforce the clause if the relationship between the owner and the general contractor is a sham.

  • At or about the time a subcontractor would be entitled to cease work under the Texas Prompt Pay Act as a result of non-payment, it may advise the general contractor that further work will not be subject to the contingent payment clause.

  • A general contractor may not enforce a contingent payment clause when to do so would be unconscionable.

    It is the last point that defied precise definition. Instead, the negotiating teams agreed that a certain amount of uncertainty might well be preferable. By leaving the area somewhat indeterminate, settlement and cooperation would be encouraged out of necessity.

    The draft bill is far from law, but both groups are pleased with it and the prospect of starting a legislative session without the usual rancor on this issue.

    Drafts of the bill and explanatory materials are available at the TCA website:

    Risk is president/CEO of the Texas Construction Association. Nelson is president of SureTec Information Systems Inc. and chairman of the Texas Building Branch, AGC Legislative Committee.

    Publication date: 08/05/2002

  • Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to The NEWS Magazine

    You must login or register in order to post a comment.



    Image Galleries

    2015 ACCA Conference

    Images from the 2015 ACCA Conference in Grapevine, Texas. Posted on April 8, 2015.


    NEWSMakers: Mark Crockett
    Mark Crockett vice president, Crockett Facilities Services, explains the importance of technician training, the value of being a top minority-owned company in the U.S., current projects the company is managing, and much more. Posted on April 24.
    More Podcasts


    NEWS 04-20-15 cover

    2015 April 20

    Check out the weekly edition of The NEWS today!

    Table Of Contents Subscribe

    Global Warming

    Do you believe in man-made global warming?
    View Results Poll Archive


    2015 National Plumbing & HVAC Estimator

    Every plumbing and HVAC estimator can use the cost estimates in this practical manual!

    More Products

    Clear Seas Research


    Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications, Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.


    Magazine image
    Register today for complete access to Get full access to the latest features, Extra Edition, and more.


    facebook icontwitter iconyoutube iconLinkedIn i con