- HOME
- MAGAZINE
- TOPICS
- EXTRA EDITION
- NEWS
- PRODUCTS
- COLUMNS
- EXCLUSIVES
- RESOURCES
- MULTIMEDIA
The June 19 EPA report said, “Substitutes are reviewed on the basis of ozone depletion potential, global warming potential, toxicity, flammability, and exposure potential.”
The R-22 alternatives deemed acceptable by the EPA are identified by designations assigned by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) as well as some by trade names. The list also notes whether or not the alternative can be used in retrofit or new applications or both.
The following is the “acceptable substitutes for HCFCs (class II ODS) in household and light commercial a/c” and whether each is for retrofit (R) or new (N) applications or both. Here, the listings are arranged in numerical order.
• RS-44; R/N
• R-125/134a/600a; R/N
• R-125/290/134a/600a; R/N
• HFC-134a; N
• R-404A; R/N
• R-407A; R/N
• R-407C; R/N
• R-410A; N
• R-410B; N
• R-417A, ISCEON 59, NU-22; R/N
• R-421A; R/N
• R-422B; R/N
• R-422C; R/N
• R-422D; R/N
• R-424A; R/N
• R-427A; R
• R-434A; R/N
• R-507; R/N
• R-507A; R/N
• Ammonia absorption; N
• Evaporative/desiccant cooling; N
• KDD5; R/N
• THR-03; N
A Google search for THR-03 did not produce information on the refrigerant. However, in the June 19, 2009 EPA report there was a note saying THR-03 in new applications “applies only to window-unit residential air conditioning, and not to central air conditioning systems.”
Publication date: 08/03/2009


More

With access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications, 



