This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
While well intentioned, geothermal heat pump (GHP) incentives — including rebates, electricity cost reductions, tax incentives, and grants from utilities and governments — can be detrimental to the acceptance of the technology if steps aren’t taken to ensure successful installations. Even with such carrots to motivate adoption of GHP systems, some programs have experienced problems due to improper design, installation, and validation.
Two primary reasons contribute to programming problems. First of all, several programs lack the accountability necessary to verify that a system is designed, installed, and tested. This results in a lack of validated performance and operation, and no end-user follow-up, to ensure the consumer is satisfied with the final product.