All major manufacturers of three-phase ac induction motors offer “inverter-duty” or “inverter-ready” models, but while these motors have inverter-rated insulation to protect the windings, the bearings — their most vulnerable parts — are too often ignored. Unfortunately, many customers who purchase these motors do not understand this. The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) has yet to recommend that new motors have bearing protection against damaging electrical discharges.
It is now common knowledge that inverters, also known as variable frequency drives (VFDs) and adjustable speed drives, can induce unwanted motor shaft voltages that, without effective mitigation, can destroy bearings, causing premature motor failure.
Although current NEMA standards highlight the possible need for extra bearing protection for VFD-driven motors, the language is often not specific enough to guide motor manufacturers and has not been updated to include new research results and developments in shaft grounding technology. Stronger, reworked standards, calling for effective mitigation in the form of reliable long-term shaft grounding technology would go a long way toward cautioning motor users of the need for such mitigation and would help to clear up common misconceptions.
VFDs can save 30 percent or more in energy costs. Because of this, they have been cited as a key technology for those wishing to make their commercial HVAC systems and other processes more energy efficient. But, whether used to control a motor’s speed or torque, VFDs often induce voltages and currents that can damage bearings. In fact, the costly repair or replacement of failed motor bearings can wipe out any savings that a VFD yields and severely diminish the reliability of an entire system. And, when a VFD-controlled motor fails, warranty claims against motor and VFD manufacturers may not pan out. Because systems that use VFDs are so varied, the liability question is a hot potato.
In virtually every case, the most reliable and cost-effective way to minimize electrical bearing damage and make these systems sustainable is a motor shaft grounding ring (combined with insulation for motors greater than 100 hp).
Unlike older single-point contact brushes, new grounding rings encircle a motor’s shaft with contact points for far greater effectiveness. One model, the AEGIS® SGR bearing protection ring, has continuous circumferential rows of specially engineered microfibers to boost electron transfer rates and provide very low impedance from shaft to frame. These rings safely bleed damaging currents to ground, bypassing a motor’s bearings entirely.
Recognizing that the best solution is to design motors from the ground up to survive the damaging effects of VFDs, a few forward-looking motor manufacturers have recently added the bearing ring as a standard or optional feature on certain models.
For example, Baldor Electric Co. (now part of the ABB Group) has introduced a line of inverter-ready Super-E® NEMA Premium® motors with the AEGIS ring installed inside. These include HVAC motors that run fans in air handlers, or pumps such as chilled water pumps, and other applications. Baldor offers models from 1 to 100 hp in open drip-proof (ODP) and totally enclosed fan-cooled (TEFC) configurations with the bearing protection factory installed.
In addition, General Electric equips its A$D Ultra Constant Torque variable speed drive motors (1.5 to 300 hp) with internally mounted AEGIS rings and offers the ring as an externally mounted option on its Energy Saver® ODP and TEFC motors. These motors are designed for metal processing and other tough-duty applications as well as HVAC and other general-purpose applications.
But these motors are exceptions to the rule. And while many motor manufacturers will, at a customer’s request, add bearing rings to their motors before shipping them, for motors already in service the rings must be retrofitted by the customer or contractor.
Damage to windings and bearings alike is caused by repetitive and extremely rapid pulses applied to the motor from a modern VFD’s non-sinusoidal power-switching circuitry. The names used to describe this phenomenon include harmonic content, parasitic capacitance, capacitive coupling, electrostatic buildup, and common mode voltage. Regardless of the name used, high peak voltages and fast voltage rise times can cause cumulative degradation of insulation, bearings, coil varnish, etc. If the load impedance is higher than the line impedance, current is reflected back toward the VFD, creating voltage spikes at the motor terminal that can be twice as high as the dc bus voltage.
The cumulative bearing damage caused by VFD-induced currents is often overlooked until it is too late to save the motor.
Without some form of mitigation, shaft currents discharge through bearings, causing unwanted electrical discharge machining (EDMing) that erodes the bearings and race walls (Figure 1) and leads to premature bearing/motor failure. Before long, these frequent discharges can leave the entire bearing race riddled with pits known as frosting (Figure 2). In fact, electrical damage has become the most common cause of bearing failure in VFD-controlled ac motors.
In a phenomenon called fluting (Figure 3), the operational frequency of the VFD causes concentrated pitting at regular intervals along the race wall, forming washboard-like ridges. Fluting can cause excessive noise and vibration, which, in an HVAC system, can be magnified and transmitted by ductwork throughout the entire building. By the time this is noticeable, bearing failure is often imminent.
In its key role as information provider, NEMA is in the unique position to update its MG1 standard to more clearly state that common mode shaft voltages are present in virtually all motors fed by pulse-width-modulated (PWM) VFDs. Since no other entity is in such a position of authority, NEMA could at the same time address the overall problem of electrical bearing damage more clearly and firmly.
The association’s current standards acknowledge the potential damage from VFD-induced voltage spikes. The standards state that motors controlled by modern VFDs containing insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs) should be designed to withstand repeated spikes (at the terminals) of up to 3.1 times the motor’s rated voltage, at rise times not less than 0.1 microsecond. Yet, when addressing the potential for bearing currents the language is far less prescriptive.
NEMA Standard MG1-2009 (Revision 1-2010), Section IV, Part 31, Definite-Purpose Inverter-Fed Polyphase Motors, correctly states: “Shaft voltages can result in the flow of destructive currents through motor bearings, manifesting themselves through pitting of the bearings, scoring of the shaft, and eventual bearing failure.”
Subsection 220.127.116.11 of Part 31 recommends bearing insulation at one end of a larger motor (defined as “usually 500 frame or larger,” horsepower unspecified) if the peak shaft voltage is greater than 300 millivolts. Unfortunately, the paragraph dealing with these larger motors only mentions circulating end-to-end shaft currents caused by magnetic dissymmetries under sinusoidal operation. It fails to add that the bearings of large motors can also be plagued by VFD-induced, high-frequency capacitively coupled common mode voltages.
In a paragraph on “much smaller motors” (frame size and horsepower unspecified), the same subsection recommends insulating both bearings or installing shaft grounding brushes to divert damaging currents around the bearings. For these motors, the standard correctly explains, a VFD can generate high-frequency common mode voltage, which shifts the three-phase-winding neutral potentials significantly from ground. Because the damaging voltage oscillates at high frequency and is capacitively coupled to the rotor, the current path to ground can run through one bearing or both. But here the standard neglects to mention that high-frequency circulating currents may also be present in VFD-driven motors as small as 100 hp.
To summarize, NEMA omits common mode voltages from its paragraph on larger motors and omits circulating currents from its paragraph on smaller motors. Another problem with NEMA’s current language is that neither a grounding brush nor insulation is a reliable, long-term solution to the problem of electrical bearing damage at the system level, which includes motors and attached equipment.
To its credit, the NEMA standard does correctly point out that “insulating the motor bearings will not prevent the damage of other shaft connected equipment.” When the path to the bearings is simply blocked by insulation, the damaging current seeks another path to ground. That other path can go through a pump, gearbox, tachometer, encoder, etc., which consequently can end up with bearing damage of its own. The economical solution, of course, would be a maintenance-free, long-life shaft grounding ring that protects attached equipment as well as the motor’s bearings.
When designing a true inverter-ready motor, a manufacturer should strive to protect the motor’s bearings as well as its windings. Stronger NEMA standards would be an incentive for built-in bearing protection that extends motor life. The following measures have proven effective under actual operating conditions and should be considered for inclusion in any NEMA standards updates:
For motors above 100 hp, where both circulating currents and common mode voltages could cause bearing damage, combining an insulated bearing on one end with a shaft grounding ring on the opposite end provides the best protection from electrical bearing damage (Figure 4).
For motors up to 100 hp, where common mode voltages could cause bearing damage, adding a shaft grounding ring to the motor, either inside the motor or externally, provides effective protection against bearing currents for motor bearings as well as attached equipment (Figure 5).
Virtually all VFD-driven motors are vulnerable to bearing damage, but for too long the importance of shaft grounding to protect motor bearings has been ignored or underestimated. To make the savings generated by VFDs sustainable, an effective long-term method of shaft grounding is essential.
Current NEMA standards dealing with the problem of shaft voltages are incomplete or not specific enough to help. While they point out the problem of VFD-caused bearing damage, they often understate the potential for such damage. They do not acknowledge the combination of capacitively induced shaft voltages and high-frequency circulating currents from VFDs. Furthermore, they fail to take into account recent advances in technology such as microfiber shaft grounding rings.
For motors without adequate bearing protection, the term inverter-duty is misleading — it ignores a major potential cause of premature bearing and motor failure — electrical discharge machining. And while some leading motor manufacturers are now installing bearing protection in selected models, most motors labeled inverter-duty or inverter-ready are still not adequately protected. It is thus incumbent on savvy specifiers to make sure that any motor to be used with a VFD is truly inverter-ready — equipped at the factory or retrofitted not just with extra winding insulation but also with a shaft grounding ring and, in certain cases, an insulated bearing.
Publication date: 2/4/2013