The Ups and Downs of Minnesota’s Energy Code
The state even offered “Resi-dential Ventilation Strategies” classes, which instructed contractors on the mechanical requirements of the new code.
But for now, forget the mechanical requirements. There’s still a good deal of confusion about the code itself. Some contractors are even unsure whether or not the code took effect April 15.
One of the main reasons for the confusion is that newspaper reports erroneously stated that the code did not take effect. In addition, there was a last-minute revision to the code that allows builders to choose which standard to apply to their houses.
The bottom line, however, is that all new homes will require some kind of mechanical ventilation.
Many homebuilders aren’t happy with the new code, saying that homeowners can’t afford the additional $6,000 to $8,000 for a house built to new code standards.
Most contractors, on the other hand, believe that the mechanical ventilation outlined in the 2000 Energy Code is just what’s needed to fix many of the problems, such as moisture on windows, associated with new tight construction.
Still others are concerned with how they will comply with the new code and who will be enforcing it.
Two StandardsMinnesota’s 1994 Energy Code gave builders two standards for constructing homes:
According to the code, a Category 1 house is designed to be safer, more durable, and more energy efficient. Category 1 homes mandate that outdoor air must be delivered to each habitable room by some means such as individual inlets, separate duct systems, or a forced-air system.
It’s estimated that in recent years, only 10% of Minnesota houses have been built according to Category 1 standards.
All the rest have been built to Category 2 standards, which are considered to be a baseline construction level that relies on drafts and open windows for ventilation.
The 2000 Energy Code essentially outlawed Category 2 homes altogether and now requires builders to construct homes based on either Category 1 standards or the new energy code standards — the choice is theirs.
In addition to mechanical ventilation, the new code requires all non-solid fuel combustion appliances (furnaces, boilers, water heaters, and gas fireplaces) to be either direct vent, power vent, or sealed combustion. (There are other requirements of the new code as well, which can be found on the Minnesota Department of Commerce website at www.commerce.state.mn.us).
Contractors AgreeMark Sims, president of Suburban Air, Minneapolis, says that another important requirement of the new code is a continuous air and vapor barrier.
“Based on experience learned from our previous energy code, which required sealing but not mechanical ventilation,” he explains, “the new code incorporates mechanical ventilation to help ensure adequate indoor air quality and minimize damage to the home due to excessive moisture build-up inside the house and wall cavities.”
Richard Wecker, of Apollo Heating and Ventilation, Oakdale, MN and Twin Cities Metropolitan Chapter president of ACCA, says, “We really do feel there are some problems that need to be addressed with tightening up homes.
“We see problems with moisture retention in houses, and there are problems with backdrafting of appliances when certain fans are running,” says Wecker.
Controversial Since Its InceptionThe new code has been controversial from the beginning. One of the biggest sticking points is who will be enforcing the code.
Questions still arise, such as how can the state educate a multitude of inspectors in different communities? How can the state make sure the enforcement will be equal? Will the code be uniform throughout the state?
Phil Smith, energy specialist with the Minnesota Department of Commerce, says building inspectors have no choice but to base their decisions on the rules, which should make inspections uniform throughout the state. “We’re publishing interpretations of the code. There are some on our web page right now, and there will be more going up shortly. We’re going to continue that process.”
Wecker says that some of the controversy in regard to the energy code could have been eliminated had there been better communication between the Department of Energy, which wrote the energy code, and the Department of Building Codes and Standards, which wrote the mechanical code.
Another problem, Sims notes, is that the new requirement for mechanical ventilation increases the amount of time an hvac contractor will have to spend in a new home — time that he just might not have.
“With the existing labor shortage, this will only serve to put increased pressure on an already volatile situation,” says Sims. He also notes that installing mandatory mechanical ventilation will increase contractor revenue, so contractors can benefit.
Now that builders have a choice about which code to implement, partially built homes are in limbo. There are many new homes already earmarked to go forward with the new code. Builders are left to decide whether or not to still include all the options mandated in the new code, or just include what was in the Category 1 code.
Inspectors are confused, contractors are confused. “We’re still trying to sort it out,” says Wecker.
The one positive side to this issue is that it’s raised public awareness of the benefits of mechanical ventilation. Wecker notes that he’s seen a general increase in the number of homeowners looking for a solution to their moisture problems. He usually recommends air-to-air heat exchangers, which can cost anywhere between $1,500 and $3,000, depending on the home.
Wecker adds, “Most of the contractors feel that the best path with new homes is 90%-efficient, sealed-combustion equipment with air-to-air heat exchangers.”
Sidebar: Mechanical Ventilation RequirementsThe following describes how contractors can comply with the 2000 Minnesota Energy Code.
Ventilation requirements: Calculate the size (in cfm) of the required mechanical ventilation system by multiplying the home’s conditioned square footage area (which normally would include the basement) by 0.05.
The Department of Public Service (DPS) recommends that this total ventilation rate be considered as having two parts — “people ventilation” for round-the-clock use, and “supplemental ventilation” for times when extra ventilation is needed. Calculate the people ventilation as 15 cfm for each bedroom, plus an additional 15 cfm; the people ventilation rate should not be less than 45 cfm.
The supplemental ventilation is the total ventilation computed as above, minus the people ventilation rate.
Equipment requirements: Fans providing the people ventilation (or all the ventilation fans if people ventilation is not separately identified) must be listed for continuous operation. The sound rating is limited for surface-mounted fans to 1.0 sone, and for other fans, 1.5 sones. Ventilation may be provided by systems using a heat-recovery ventilator (HRV), a mixing box, or separate fans.
Distribution, installation, and certification requirements: Residential mechanical ventilation system fans and ducts must be sized to provide the required airflow. Seal all ducts outside the interior air barrier with a product meeting UL181 or equivalent.
Note: Use of cloth-backed duct tape with rubber adhesive is specifically prohibited for this application.
Controls for fan(s) providing the people ventilation must be accessible to the homeowner and identified with the words “ventilation” or “ventilation fan.”
If either the ventilation exhaust or supply ducts connect to furnace ductwork, then the furnace blower must provide an hourly average minimum flow rate of 0.15 cfm per square foot of house area (typically 20 min per hr) whenever the residential ventilation system is running. If both exhaust and supply ventilation system ducts connect to furnace ductwork, then the furnace blower must run whenever the residential ventilation system is running.
Systems must be verified following installation by visual and physical examination. The verification must include measurement of the airflow at air intake and exhaust points (from the house, not from individual rooms within the house) with design airflow of 30 cfm and greater. This should be verified by the installer or builder.
— Joanna R. Turpin