the NEWS
Advertisement:
HVACR Directory | Extra Edition | Learning Center | Editorial Blogs | Product Gallery
  Home
  About the NEWS
  Subscription Info
  e-Newsletters
  Contact Us
  Resources
  Archived Editorial
  Blogs
  Career Center - Employers
  Career Center - Job Seekers
  Columns
  Distributor Corner
  Calendar of Events
  HVACR Directory
  Industry Links
  Learning Center
  Letters
  Manufacturer Reports
  Regional Reports
  Reprints
  Survey Says
  Training Track
  Webinars
  AEC Store
  Market Research
  Extra Edition
  HVACR Forum
  Legal forum
  Business Management
  Dot Comment
  Energy Matters
  Features
  Newsline
  People
  Service Hotline
  Service & Maintenance
  Technical
  Advertising
  Ad Index
  Media Kit
  Submit Press Release
  Services
  Classifieds
  Digital Edition
  Post Cards
spacer
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Letters: 01/19/2009

January 19, 2009

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Try to Get the Public Into Expo

Advertisement:

For more info, click here
[Editor’s note: This letter is in response to Mark Skaer’s blog “Skaer-Tactics: What am I Missing Here?” Dec. 1.]

Your proposal to the Air-Conditioning, Heating, Refrigerating Exposition (AHR Expo) under the conditions stated in your article was appropriate, but I surmise unexpected. As a follow-up to reintroduce your proposal, please allow me to suggest a possible approach: If you are able to identify all of the members, send each an individual letter or e-mail requesting how they voted and the reasons for their vote. Additionally, document why you think it is a good idea. Also indicate that they not need provide their identification on their response.

Maybe by now they have given your proposal more thought. If not, your follow-up might create further reflection. Don’t just drop your idea. Never give up.

Michael G. Paradis
Sterling Heights, Mich.


13 SEER Mandate Is Causing an Increase in Energy Use

[Editor’s note: This letter is in response to Mike Murphy’s column “Murphy’s Law: Standards, Regs, and Bears, Oh My!” Dec. 8, 2008.]

Here in North Texas, far too many HVAC systems are being repaired and not replaced, mainly due to the 13 SEER baseline change. Thirteen SEER and above is perceived as too expensive by the consumer.

Many 10 and 12 SEER systems, whose efficiency dramatically diminishes as they age, are being pieced back together for “one more season.” The result is increased electrical consumption.

The 13 SEER mandate has backfired. It is increasing electrical demand because systems that should not be repaired are being repaired. I expect this problem to become much worse in 2009. Consumers who have the money to replace their system will not because they have been brainwashed by the media that the economic sky is falling. Consumers who do not have the money will repair or go without altogether.

A 14 SEER mandate will only exacerbate an already open wound. Will the HVAC industry survive another bump in baseline efficiency? I hope I don’t live to see it.

Brian Bullock
Collin A/C
Plano, Texas


Send correspondence via e-mail to letters@achrnews.com.

Publication date: 01/19/2009


|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.





© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy
Your Feedback