the NEWS
HVACR Directory | Extra Edition | Learning Center | Editorial Blogs | Product Gallery
  Home
  About the NEWS
  Subscription Info
  e-Newsletter
  Contact Us
  Resources
  Archived Editorial
  Blogs
  Career Center - Employers
  Career Center - Job Seekers
  Columns
  Distributor Corner
  Calendar of Events
  HVACR Directory
  Industry Links
  Learning Center
  Letters
  Manufacturer Reports
  Regional Reports
  Newsline
  Reprints
  Survey Says
  Training Track
  Webinars
  AEC Store
  Market Research
  Extra Edition
  Business Management
  Service & Maintenance
  Technical
  Advertising
  Ad Index
  Media Kit
  Submit Press Release
  Services
  eProduct Info
  Classifieds
  Digital Edition
  List Rental
  Post Cards
spacer
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
A-Game Tactics: Axis of Climate Evil Declared
by Angela D. Harris
April 21, 2009

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



President Bush may have identified terrorism’s Axis of Evil in 2002, but it is the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that has identified the atmosphere’s Axis of Climate Evil in 2009. In a proposed finding issued in mid-April, the EPA declared that greenhouse gases contribute to air pollution and possibly pose a serious threat to public health and welfare. The six members of the Axis of Climate Evil — carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride — were declared based on a “rigorous, peer-reviewed scientific analysis by scientists around the world” that was ordered in 2007 by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The proposed endangerment finding states, “In both magnitude and probability, climate change is an enormous problem. The greenhouse gases that are responsible for it endanger public health and welfare within the meaning of the Clean Air Act.”

The analysis went so far to as to propose that climate change also has “serious national security implications.”

Sounds like trouble is on the horizon for these six. The HVACR industry may not have to worry too much about the six members of the Axis of Climate Evil, but it does need to concern itself with the climate change laws being proposed to combat them. The findings are for public comment and once the final findings have been issued, let the regulating process begin. No regulations were included in the current proposal, and of course, “Before taking any steps to reduce greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, EPA would conduct an appropriate process and consider stakeholder input.”

Can anyone figure out what the government means by “appropriate”?


Angela D. Harris
News & Legislation Editor. E-mail her at angelaharris@achrnews.com.

|PrintEmail
  Comments (4)Post a Comment
Title: 'appropriate'


This is a tough one, isn't it? For instance, what is an appropriate public response to the continued production and use of refrigerants the majority of which(R410A for instance)equal or exceed 2000 lbs equivalent CO2 per each pound? Can these refrigerants really be contained?


Title: 'appropriate' response


I am not sure they can actually be contianed, and neither is the government. This is why they are looking at a cap and trade program. It is the language of these laws and findings that potentially pose a problem in the long run. Once the government declares and enemy, it has often proven to stop at nothing in order to obliterate it...no matter what it costs or who it costs.


Title: Going Forward


I can't help thinking you are mostly sniping around the edges rather than really speaking your thoughts. Give us a clear vision of a workable solution that the Industry and society at large can live with regarding HFC's. We all know the Industry has invested heavily in this refrigerant technology and currently shows no outward interest in negotiating its position. We must all work together for a better World.
HAPPY EARTH DAY 2009


Title: Proceed with Caution


I appreciate that we must all work for a better world, but I am going to have to side with the industry on this one. We do need to be better stewards of the planet and our resources, but we can't abruptly put a stop to something without having a viable replacement for that resource. I don't have a solution to the refrigerant problem because there isn't an "everyday" alternative that has yet been created. There are alternatives, but none so far that will replace the stability and safety of the current offerings. I am afraid that Climate Change is an insatiable concept that will never be satisfied with the improvements being made. The industry has increased SEER ratings, decreased carbon footprints, and is phasing down R-22. It has also made steps to control duct leakage and monitor quality installations. I fear the push for climate change will continue to demand more and as we have hopefully learned from the past...simple appeasement will not satisfy. So as we go forward in saving the planet and improving the industry, I only ask that we proceed with caution.


 



 



Please enter the verification code as it appears in the box above.
 

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.








© 2009 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy
Your Feedback